Durable 3D-Printed Mold Inserts Drastically Cut Bottle Design Costs and Time - Core77

2022-08-13 02:10:30 By : Ms. Heidi Jiao

During my days as a structural package designer, when designing a new bottle, the last step for our department was to produce the CAD drawing of a new design. Then it went over to Engineering, who would tweak our CAD to produce the tooling drawing. Then we were ready to "cut steel," i.e. have the molds made for the blow-molding machine. That last step took months, and cost five figures.

That was in the '90s, and today you can have steel cut for a new bottle mold in about 4 weeks. However, Pepsi has figured out how to get that time down to just 48 hours, and with a cost savings of up to $10,000. It's staggering.

The way they do it is by not cutting steel at all. Instead they use a universal mold shell, then they 3D-print an insert that goes inside the mold.

People have messed around with this before, but the problem has been durability and cost. A 3D-printed ABS insert is nowhere near as strong as steel, and you can blow-mold maybe 100 bottles before the insert fails. Hardly worth your time and money, particularly since the PolyJet 3D printers required cost $250,000, the Digital ABS material you print with runs $422 per kilogram, and the prints can take three days.

To solve this, a research team led by Max Rodriguez, PepsiCo Senior Manager of Global Packaging R&D, turned to 3D printer manufacturer Nexa3D. The company used their NXE 400 Printer, an ultrafast machine "capable of printing at injection molding repeatability and tolerances, making it the fastest and most accurate production 3D printer in its category," the company says. It also costs just $60,000.

For material, the team used a polymer called xPEEK147, made by Henkel Loctite. xPEEK147 is tough, thermally stable and has high dimensional stability, and rings in at just $308 per kilogram.

The new inserts were able to print more than 10,000 bottles before failing.

And the cost savings are significant:

As a former package designer, I'm torn on this. I think it would've been so cool to be able to produce new bottle runs and design changes for small batches—new bottles for the World Cup and other major events. And I'm super-impressed with the technologies harnessed here. But then I start thinking wait…don't we have a plastic bottle problem?

In any case, you can read the case study for the above here.

In the case study it is clear from the photos that the bottle's surface telegraphs the 3D printing texture. Ok for protos, but in production? Also, blow molding is a low pressure operation- I doubt these inserts could withstand injection molding temps and pressures. Still, very cool.

I’m a lapsed industrial designer. I was born in NYC and figured I’d die there, but a few years ago I abandoned New York to live on a farm in the countryside with my wife. We have six dogs.

Test it out; it only takes a single click to unsubscribe

Don't have an account? Join Now

Already have an account? Sign In

By creating a Core77 account you confirm that you accept the Terms of Use

Please enter your email and we will send an email to reset your password.

Test it out; it only takes a single click to unsubscribe